Archive for the ‘Letters’ category

USCCR Letter Re: The Akaka Bill

August 28th, 2009

August 28, 2009

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker

The Honorable John Boehner, Republican Leader

The Honorable Harry Reid, Majority Leader

The Honorable Mitch McConnell, Republican Leader

The Honorable Nick J. Rahall II, Chairman, Committee on Natural Resources

The Honorable Doc Hastings, Ranking Member, Committee on Natural Resources

The Honorable Byron Dorgan, Chairman, Committee on Indian Affairs

The Honorable John Barrasso, Vice Chairman, Committee on Indian Affairs

The Honorable John Conyers, Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

The Honorable Lamar Smith, Ranking Member, Committee on the Judiciary

The Honorable Patrick Leahy, Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

The Honorable Jeff Sessions, Ranking Member, Committee on the Judiciary

Re: Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act

Dear Distinguished Members of Congress:

Three years ago, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights issued a report opposing the

passage of the proposed Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act. Although that

report focused on an earlier version of the proposed legislation, that earlier version was

substantially similar to S. 1011. Specifically, the report stated:

“The Commission recommends against passage of the Native Hawaiian

Government Reorganization Act … or any other legislation that would

discriminate on the basis of race or national origin and further subdivide the

American People into discrete subgroups accorded varying degrees of privilege.”

We write today to reiterate our opposition to the proposal.1 We do not believe

Congress has the constitutional authority to “reorganize” racial or ethnic groups into

dependent sovereign nations unless those groups have a long and continuous history of

separate self-governance.  Moreover, quite apart from the issue of constitutional

authority, creating such an entity sets a harmful precedent.  Ethnic Hawaiians will surely

not be the only group to demand such treatment.  On what ground will Congress tell these

other would-be tribes no?

Some advocates of S. 1011 readily concede that the bill is an effort to preserve the

State of Hawaii’s current practice of conferring an array of special benefits exclusively

on its ethnic Hawaiian citizens—to the detriment of it citizens of African, Asian,

European or other heritage.  In essence, it is an attempted end-run around the Supreme

Court’s decisions in Rice v. Cayetano2 and City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co.3 The

Constitution, however, cannot be circumvented so easily. And even if it could be, we

would oppose passing legislation with the purpose of shoring up a system of racially

exclusive benefits.4

In closing we would like to point out that in 1840, the Kingdom of Hawaii adopted

a Constitution with a bicameral, multi-racial legislature.  The Constitution was signed by

two hands—that of Kamehameha’s son King Kamehameha III and that of the holder of

the second-highest office in the nation, Keoni Ana, the son of the British-born Hawaiian

Minister John Young.  Its opening sentence, the substance of which was suggested by an

American missionary, was based loosely on a Biblical verse:   “Ua hana mai ke Akua i na

lahuikanaka a pau i ke koko hookahi, e noho like lakou ma ka honua nei me ke kuikahi, a

me ka pomaikai.” Translated, the passage might read: “God has made of one blood all

races of people to dwell upon this Earth in unity and blessedness.”

It would be ironic to attempt to honor the dynamic, cosmopolitan Kingdom of

Hawaii by disdaining these words.5 We urge you to vote against the measure.

If you would like any further information or we can do anything else to assist you,

please do not hesitate to ask.  We can be reached through the Chairman’s special

assistant, Dominique Ludvigson, at (202) 376-7626 or at

Thank you for your attention.


Gerald A. Reynolds


Abigail Thernstrom

Vice Chair

Todd Gaziano


Gail Heriot


Peter Kirsanow


Ashley Taylor, Jr.


cc: Commissioner Arlan Melendez

Commissioner Michael Yaki

Download the original PDF: Letter on Akaka Bill Aug 28 2009

once upon a krischel » An Open Letter to Barack Obama

June 16th, 2009

once upon a krischel » An Open Letter to Barack Obama

A plea for racial equality from our first hapa-haole president.

Most in Hawai’i don’t support the Akaka bill

July 20th, 2007

(as printed in the July 20, 2007 Honolulu Advertiser)

Congresswoman Mazie Hirono’s press release on the appointment of William Burgess and Paul Sullivan to the Hawai’i Civil Rights Advisory Board in which she states that the “group does not appear to reflect the position of the majority of the people of Hawai’i” misrepresents what I know to be the more prevalent public opinion about the Akaka bill.

» Read more: Most in Hawai’i don’t support the Akaka bill

Testimony regarding S.310 (The Akaka Bill)

May 8th, 2007

This testimony was submitted to the United States Committee on Indian Affairs regarding S.310.

S. 310 Hearing May 3, 2007

Aloha, and thank you for keeping the record open for further testimony on the Akaka Bill (S.310).

Much of the difficulty with this bill and its supporters is that they are starting from false premises. In his opening statement, Senator Dorgan wrote:

“It allows for the Native Hawaiian people to once again have an opportunity at self-governance and self-determination.”

Contrary to Senator Dorgan’s implication, the Native Hawaiian people have both self-governance and self-determination this very moment, only not as a separate racial group. Also contrary to Senator Dorgan’s implication, there has never been any race-based government in the entire history of the Hawaiian islands, including before western contact in 1778, and in fact, the Hawaiian Kingdom’s first constitution explicitly declared all people “of one blood”, and maintained itself without reference to race.

» Read more: Testimony regarding S.310 (The Akaka Bill)

Native Hawaiian “birthright” suspect

January 16th, 2007

In a January 12th response to a January 9th article I wrote for the Honolulu Advertiser, the leaders of OHA claimed, “Native Hawaiians are the indigenous people of Hawai’i, and have the right to thrive in their ancient homeland.” I find this sentiment frightening in its consequences, contrary to the ideas of freedom, and based on false premises.

What we today call “Native Hawaiians” did not spring from the mountains of Oahu, or the beaches of Maui. As exemplified by the quintessential example of Native Hawaiian culture, the Hokule’a (now voyaging to Micronesia), Hawaiians were voyagers, explorers, and colonists from other islands in the Pacific and beyond. Their “ancient homeland” can be arbitrarily placed anywhere between Hawaii and the path they took from Africa, depending on which date one chooses. As with every people who have ever travelled to Hawaii, “Native Hawaiians” came from somewhere else – we are all immigrants here, separated only by the amount of time since our ancestor’s original arrival. To assert some special, distinct status, based on a single drop of blood before an arbitrary point in time, over all of ones’ peers who have lived together side by side for over 200 years is simply abject racism.

» Read more: Native Hawaiian “birthright” suspect